Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Kepler Input Catalog: Photometric Calibration and Stellar Classification

  • Authors: Timothy M. Brown, David W. Latham, Mark E. Everett, and Gilbert A. Esquerdo

Brown et al. 2011 The Astronomical Journal 142 112.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 5.

Comparison between observed and model colors. This plot represents all of the stars contained in one tile, covering an area spanning 1 deg in R.A. by 1 deg in decl. on the sky near galactic latitude b sime 10 fdg5. Each point corresponds to one star, and the plotted positions show the residuals (in magnitudes) after subtracting the best-fit model from the photometry for that star, for two chosen colors (e.g., gi vs. gr, as in panel a). Different panels show various combinations of colors, indicated in the axis labels. The tile plotted here (at R.A. = 292° and decl. = +40°) is fairly typical of areas in which the model fits are good. There are several notable features. In panels (a) and (b), the rms scatter in the residuals is 0.02 mag or less in each of gr, ri, and gD51. Errors are anticorrelated between gr and gi, but this tendency is more noticeable and has a different slope in the wings of the distributions than in the cores. In panels (c) and (d), note the larger scatter (especially in zJ), and also the strong negative correlations between these pairs of residuals. In panels (e) and (f), note the change in plot scale; the residuals in the IR colors are much larger than in the visible bands. The JK and gi residuals are almost uncorrelated, but one now sees a very significant offset from zero of the mean residual in gi. The two IR colors in the bottom panel have only slightly correlated residuals, but the center of the JH distribution is also far displaced from zero.

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions