Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Phibss: Molecular Gas, Extinction, Star Formation, and Kinematics in the z = 1.5 Star-forming Galaxy EGS13011166

  • Authors: R. Genzel, L. J. Tacconi, J. Kurk, S. Wuyts, F. Combes, J. Freundlich, A. Bolatto, M. C. Cooper, R. Neri, R. Nordon, F. Bournaud, A. Burkert, J. Comerford, P. Cox, M. Davis, N. M. Förster Schreiber, S. García-Burillo, J. Gracia-Carpio, D. Lutz, T. Naab, S. Newman, A. Saintonge, K. Shapiro Griffin, A. Shapley, A. Sternberg, and B. Weiner

Genzel et al. 2013 The Astrophysical Journal 773 68.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 7.

Comparison of effective screen extinction, as inferred from SED analysis of the four-band HST images, and the CO molecular gas mass surface density Σ mol gas. Left panel: comparisons of the two-dimensional distributions (CO in white contours, A( V) in color) at the same FWHM resolution of ~0 farcs75, and sampled on a 0 farcs25 grid. Right panel: pixel-by-pixel correlation between molecular column density (horizontal scale) and effective screen optical depth at Hα (τ(Hα) = 0.73 × A( V); Calzetti et al. 2000), with a typical uncertainty marked as a black cross. The black and dotted red curves are models for a homogenous mixture of gas, dust, and stars, where τ effective screen(Hα) = ln ((Σ mol gas/30 b)/{1 − exp (− (Σ mol gas/30 b))}), where b is the ratio of total molecular gas column to Hα optical depth in units of the diffuse Galactic ISM value (Σ/τ(Hα)) MW ISM = 30  M  pc −2, or ( N(H)/ A( V)) MW ISM = 2 × 10 21 cm −2 mag −1 (Bohlin et al. 1978; see also Wuyts et al. 2011a; Nordon et al. 2013). The best-fitting curve has b = 4.7 ± 0.3, in good agreement with the findings of Nordon et al. (2013) for z ~ 1–3 main-sequence galaxies observed in the UV, Herschel PACS, and CO.

Other Images in This Article
Copyright and Terms & Conditions