Figure 2 from

Image Details

View Article Bookmark & Share

Choose export citation format:

Export Citation

Hi-Resolution Export to PDF PPT Format

Uniform Recalibration of Common Spectrophotometry Standard Stars onto the CALSPEC System Using the SuperNova Integral Field Spectrograph

Authors: David Rubin, G. Aldering, P. Antilogus, C. Aragon, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, S. Bongard, K. Boone, C. Buton, Y. Copin, S. Dixon, D. Fouchez, E. Gangler, R. Gupta, B. Hayden, W. Hillebrandt, A. G. Kim, M. Kowalski, D. Küsters, P.-F. Léget, F. Mondon, J. Nordin, R. Pain, E. Pecontal, R. Pereira, S. Perlmutter, K. A. Ponder, D. Rabinowitz, M. Rigault, K. Runge, C. Saunders, G. Smadja, N. Suzuki, C. Tao, S. Taubenberger, R. C. Thomas, M. Vincenzi

David Rubin et al 2022 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 263 .

Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 2.

The per-transit rms of the Gaia G magnitude vs. the G magnitude. The rms includes Gaia measurement errors and any stellar variability that may be present. The legend identifies stars in order of their G-band magnitude. The cyan-shaded regions indicate the 3σ and 5σ measurement uncertainty ranges expected from the typical Gaia measurement accuracy (taken from Riello et al. 2021). Stars with significant rms—larger than 0.015 mag and 3σ larger than the expected measurement uncertainty—are labeled.

Copyright and Terms & Conditions

Additional terms of reuse

Other Images in This Article

Copyright and Terms & Conditions