Image Details

Choose export citation format:

PAH Marks the Spot: Digging for Buried Clusters in Nearby Star-forming Galaxies

  • Authors: Gabrielle B. Graham, Daniel A. Dale, Chase L. Smith, Elisabeth Brann, Kaycee D. Conder, Samuel Crowe, Sumitra Dhileepkumar, Nicole A. Imming, Emilio Mendez, Zachary Pleska, Kelsey Sako, Amirnezam Amiri, Ashley T. Barnes, Médéric Boquien, Rupali Chandar, Ryan Chown, Oleg Y. Gnedin, Kathryn Grasha, Stephen Hannon, Hamid Hassani, Rémy Indebetouw, Hwihyun Kim, Jaeyeon Kim, Hannah Koziol, Kirsten L. Larson, Janice C. Lee, Adam K. Leroy, Elias K. Oakes, M. Jimena Rodríguez, Erik Rosolowsky, Karin Sandstrom, Eva Schinnerer, Jessica Sutter, David A. Thilker, Leonardo Ubeda, Bradley C. Whitmore, Tony D. Weinbeck, Thomas G. Williams, Aida Wofford, J. Eduardo Méndez-Delgado, Qiushi Chris Tian

Gabrielle B. Graham et al 2025 The Astronomical Journal 170 .

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 5.

Cluster candidate ages using photometric Paα equivalent widths (see Section 5.2.1 for details). The cyan circles show the distribution of 291 sources with good age estimates using the Starburst99 model (purple). The histograms show the distribution of these sources on each axis with the medians indicated by a vertical line. A majority of our embedded cluster candidates are less than 6 Myr old, with a significant portion less than 5 Myr old (73%). For comparison, six CIGALE models are shown with color indicating the escape fraction modeled. These models show that the age derived will vary significantly at lower equivalent widths and less so for high equivalent widths. The young ages derived via Paα equivalent widths indicate that it is likely that the first supernovae have yet to unbind the natal shroud of gas and dust (S. T. Linden et al. 2023; S. Deshmukh et al. 2024).

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions

Additional terms of reuse