Image Details

Choose export citation format:

RAPIDLY RISING TRANSIENTS IN THE SUPERNOVA—SUPERLUMINOUS SUPERNOVA GAP

  • Authors: Iair Arcavi, William M. Wolf, D. Andrew Howell, Lars Bildsten, Giorgos Leloudas, Delphine Hardin, Szymon Prajs, Daniel A. Perley, Gilad Svirski, Avishay Gal-Yam, Boaz Katz, Curtis McCully, S. Bradley Cenko, Chris Lidman, Mark Sullivan, Stefano Valenti, Pierre Astier, Cristophe Balland, Ray G. Carlberg, Alex Conley, Dominique Fouchez, Julien Guy, Reynald Pain, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Kathy Perrett, Chris J. Pritchet, Nicolas Regnault, James Rich, and Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider

2016 The Astrophysical Journal 819 35.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 8.

Peak magnitude vs. rise time of our events (upper limits for the SNLS rise times) compared to other SNe (see text for references). All comparison data peak magnitudes and rise times are in the observed R or r band. Rise times are in the rest frame of each event. Ejecta mass estimates are normalized to an expansion velocity of 10,000 km s−1 (see text for details, also regarding the calculated nickel masses) and should only be considered approximate. Our events have shorter rise times compared to most SNe and are more luminous than all similarly rapid events except for Dougie, which is a clear outlier in this context. The only event similar to ours is SN 2011kl, which was accompanied by an ultra-long-duration GRB (Greiner et al. 2015). The positions of our events in this phase space require either a very high nickel to ejecta mass ratio or an alternative dominant power source to nickel decay.

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions