Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Reverberation Mapping of the Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 7469

  • Authors: B. M. Peterson, C. J. Grier, Keith Horne, R. W. Pogge, M. C. Bentz, G. De Rosa, K. D. Denney   Paul Martini, S. G. Sergeev, S. Kaspi, T. Minezaki, Y. Zu, C. S. Kochanek, R. J. Siverd, B. Shappee, C. Araya Salvo, T. G. Beatty, J. C. Bird, D. J. Bord, G. A. Borman, X. Che, C.-T. Chen, S. A. Cohen, M. Dietrich, V. T. Doroshenko, T. Drake, Yu. S. Efimov   N. Free, I. Ginsburg, C. B. Henderson, A. L. King, S. Koshida, K. Mogren, M. Molina, A. M. Mosquera, K. Motohara, S. V. Nazarov, D. N. Okhmat, O. Pejcha   S. Rafter, J. C. Shields, D. M. Skowron, J. Skowron, M. Valluri, J. L. van Saders, and Y. Yoshii

Peterson et al. 2014 The Astrophysical Journal 795 149.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 7.

Relationship between emission-line width and lag. The top panel shows the relationship between line dispersion in the RMS spectrum and cross-correlation centroid τcent. The open circles are lower-confidence measurements of the Hβ and Hα lines from the AGN Watch program in 1996. The red line is the fit to the relationship log σline = a + blog τ, which has slope b = −0.45  ±  0.05. The dotted magenta line is the best fit with a forced virial slope of b = −0.5. The bottom panel is exactly the same as the top panel, except that the time lags τ are from JAVELIN. The JAVELIN results for Hα and Hβ from the AGN Watch program are ambiguous and therefore not included. The best-fit slope for these data is b = −0.38  ±  0.06.

Other Images in This Article
Copyright and Terms & Conditions