Ages derived from this work compared to other literature values for gyrochronology (left) and [C/N] ages (right). The sources, variance, and bias are shown in the legends. Our ages agree with other literature values reasonably well. The gyrochronology ages are taken from R. Angus et al. (2015), Y. Lu et al. (2024), L. G. Bouma et al. (2023), and E. Gaidos et al. (2023); and the [C/N] ages are taken from J. D. Roberts et al. (2024) and A. Stone-Martinez et al. (2025).