Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Polarization Analysis

  • Authors: L. Page, G. Hinshaw, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, D. N. Spergel, C. L. Bennett, C. Barnes, R. Bean, O. Doré, J. Dunkley, M. Halpern, R. S. Hill, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, N. Odegard, H. V. Peiris, G. S. Tucker, L. Verde, J. L. Weiland, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright

Page et al. 2007 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 170 335.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Fig. 16.

Comparison of the predicted ﹩C_{l}﹩ errors with (black) and without (red) assuming correlated noise in the polarization sky maps. On the y‐axis is plotted the diagonal element of the inverse of the Fisher matrix for 1 year of data. The units are (μK)4. Note that the y‐axis scale for each plot is different. In each panel EE and BB are shown. The variations in the N−1 weighting are due to the scan pattern combined with the sky cut. There is less variation for B modes than there is for E modes. W4 has the largest ﹩1/ f﹩ noise of all radiometers. One can see that the combination of ﹩1/ f﹩ noise coupled with WMAP’s scan strategy leads to a larger uncertainty than one would get from considering just the effects of ﹩1/ f﹩ noise alone.

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions