Image Details

Choose export citation format:

The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey (NGVS). I. Introduction to the Survey

  • Authors: Laura Ferrarese, Patrick Côté, Jean-Charles Cuillandre, S. D. J. Gwyn, Eric W. Peng, Lauren A. MacArthur, Pierre-Alain Duc, A. Boselli, Simona Mei, Thomas Erben, Alan W. McConnachie, Patrick R. Durrell, J. Christopher Mihos, Andrés Jordán, Ariane Lançon, Thomas H. Puzia, Eric Emsellem, Michael L. Balogh, John P. Blakeslee, Ludovic van Waerbeke, Raphaël Gavazzi, Bernd Vollmer, J. J. Kavelaars, David Woods, Nicholas M. Ball, S. Boissier, Stéphane Courteau, E. Ferriere, G. Gavazzi, Hendrik Hildebrandt, P. Hudelot, M. Huertas-Company, Chengze Liu, Dean McLaughlin, Y. Mellier, Martha Milkeraitis, David Schade, Chantal Balkowski, Frédéric Bournaud, R. G. Carlberg, S. C. Chapman, Henk Hoekstra, Chien Peng, Marcin Sawicki, Luc Simard, James E. Taylor, R. Brent Tully, Wim van Driel, Christine D. Wilson, Todd Burdullis, Billy Mahoney, and Nadine Manset

Ferrarese et al. 2012 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 200 4.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 7.

Point-source signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) as a function of magnitude at the full depth of the stacked NGVS images. Curves show results obtained in the different bandpasses. Dark sky conditions are assumed for u* and g; for the r band we show the S/N expected under dark and gray sky conditions as solid and dashed curves, respectively. For the i and z filters, there is essentially no difference between dark and gray sky conditions, although it should be noted that the sky background in those bands varies significantly with airmass, a parameter that is loosely constrained for the NGVS. All calculations assume an airmass of 1.2 and seeing equal to the median value measured in each filter from all NGVS data obtained between 2009 and 2011 (as shown in Figure 8). The S/N is calculated in an optimal aperture with radius equal to two-thirds of the measured FWHM for point sources. Dotted lines are drawn at S/N = 5 and 10: Note that the limiting magnitudes shown in this figure do not necessarily correspond to those listed in Table 2, which were calculated assuming the worse acceptable seeing for the NGVS exposures (1 farcs1 in u*, 1 farcs0 in g, r, z, and 0 farcs6 in i).

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions