Image Details

Choose export citation format:

The Orbital Eccentricity–Radius Distribution for Warm, Single Planets in TESS

  • Authors: Tyler R. Fairnington, Jiayin Dong, Chelsea X. Huang, Emma Nabbie, George Zhou, Duncan Wright, Karen A. Collins, David Ciardi, Jon M. Jenkins, David W. Latham, George Ricker, Samuel N. Quinn, Sara Seager, Avi Shporer, Roland Vanderspek, Joshua N. Winn, Khalid Barkaoui, Allyson Bieryla, Lars Buchhave, Dmitry Cheryasov, Jessie Christiansen, Courtney Dressing, Akihiko Fukui, Alexey Garmash, Steven Giacalone, Eric G. Hintz, Steve B. Howell, Keisuke Isogai, Jerome de Leon, Jorge Lillo-Box, Felipe Murgas, Norio Narita, Louise D. Nielsen, Enric Palle, Markus Rabus, Benjamin V. Rackham, Richard P. Schwarz, Gregor Srdoc, Denise C. Stephens, Gavin Wang, Noriharu Watanabe, Francis P. Wilkin, Joe Williams

Tyler R. Fairnington et al 2026 The Astrophysical Journal Letters 1008 .

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 8.

Eccentricity–radius diagram for the planet sample. Points show the mode eccentricity, with errors drawn from 68% credible intervals. The curves indicate first-order scattering-based characteristic eccentricities, ﹩{e}_{{\rm{sc}}}=\sqrt{{\rm{\Theta }}}﹩, evaluated at fixed (a = 0.2) au and (M = 1M), where (Θ = 2(a/Rp)(Mp/M)). Two mass–radius assumptions bound the maximum eccentricity curve: the empirical J. F. Otegi et al. (2020) relation for planets below 120M, which we cut off at our canonical sub-Saturn size, dashed line; and a Jupiter-like giant-planet scaling from D. Bashi et al. (2017), solid line. These composition-dependent curves provide illustrative upper-envelope expectations for eccentricities produced by planet–planet scattering.

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions

Additional terms of reuse