Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Evidence for a Shallow Evolution in the Volume Densities of Massive Galaxies at z = 4–8 from CEERS

  • Authors: Katherine Chworowsky, Steven L. Finkelstein, Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Elizabeth J. McGrath, Kartheik G. Iyer, Casey Papovich, Mark Dickinson, Anthony J. Taylor, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Micaela B. Bagley, Bren E. Backhaus, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Yingjie Cheng, Nikko J. Cleri, Justin W. Cole, M. C. Cooper, Luca Costantin, Avishai Dekel, Maximilien Franco, Seiji Fujimoto, Christopher C. Hayward, Benne W. Holwerda, Marc Huertas-Company, Michaela Hirschmann, Taylor A. Hutchison, Anton M. Koekemoer, Rebecca L. Larson, Zhaozhou Li, Arianna S. Long, Ray A. Lucas, Nor Pirzkal, Giulia Rodighiero, Rachel S. Somerville, Brittany N. Vanderhoof, Alexander de la Vega, Stephen M. Wilkins, Guang Yang, Jorge A. Zavala

Katherine Chworowsky et al 2024 The Astronomical Journal 168 .

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 6.

The size–mass distribution of z > 4 massive galaxies presented here. We show the effective semimajor axes measured at rest-frame 0.5 μm (measured in F277W at z = 4 and F444W at z = 7). The points are colored by redshift and the shape indicates the 10 Myr averaged sSFR values from dense basis. The best-fit size–mass relations for quiescent and star-forming galaxies from van der Wel et al. (2014) extrapolated to z = 4–8 are also shown for comparison. The gray line shows the size range of a point source from z = 4 to 7. We find that our sample is primarily star forming and the slope of our sample in the size–mass plane is consistent with the results for star-forming galaxies at lower redshifts, however, they are smaller by a factor of ∼2 than predicted when the relation is extrapolated out to higher redshifts.

Other Images in This Article
Copyright and Terms & Conditions

Additional terms of reuse