Image Details

Choose export citation format:

New Constraints on ΩM, ΩΛ, and w from an Independent Set of 11 High‐Redshift Supernovae Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope

  • Authors: R. A. Knop, G. Aldering, R. Amanullah, P. Astier, G. Blanc, M. S. Burns, A. Conley, S. E. Deustua, M. Doi, R. Ellis, S. Fabbro, G. Folatelli, A. S. Fruchter, G. Garavini, S. Garmond, K. Garton, R. Gibbons, G. Goldhaber, A. Goobar, D. E. Groom, D. Hardin, I. Hook, D. A. Howell, A. G. Kim, B. C. Lee, C. Lidman, J. Mendez, S. Nobili, P. E. Nugent, R. Pain, N. Panagia, C. R. Pennypacker, S. Perlmutter, R. Quimby, J. Raux, N. Regnault, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, G. Sainton, B. Schaefer, K. Schahmaneche, E. Smith, A. L. Spadafora, V. Stanishev, M. Sullivan, N. A. Walton, L. Wang, W. M. Wood-Vasey, N. Yasuda, and (The Supernova Cosmology Project)

Knop et al. 2003 The Astrophysical Journal 598 102.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Fig. 4.

Hubble diagram of effective K‐ and stretch‐corrected mB vs. redshift for the SNe in the primary low‐extinction subset. Filled circles represent the HST SNe of this paper. Inner error bars show just the measurement uncertainties; outer error bars include 0.17 mag of intrinsic dispersion. The solid line is the best‐fit flat‐universe cosmology from the low‐extinction subset; the dashed and dotted lines represent the indicated cosmologies.

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions