Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Lens Model Accuracy in the Expected LSST Lensed AGN Sample

  • Authors: Padmavathi Venkatraman, Sydney Erickson, Phil Marshall, Martin Millon, Philip Holloway, Simon Birrer, Steven Dillmann, Xiangyu Huang, Sreevani Jaragula, Ralf Kaehler, Narayan Khadka, Grzegorz Madejski, Ayan Mitra, Kevil Reil, Aaron Roodman

Padmavathi Venkatraman et al 2026 The Astronomical Journal 172 .

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 11.

Recovery of population-level model parameters using two different test sets. In purple we show our fiducial test set. In orange we take the same test set and change the mass–light ellipticity relation to following qmql − 0.1 (taken from SLACS lenses; A. S. Bolton et al. 2008; C. Y. Tan et al. 2024). Inset panel: we show the two different mass–light ellipticity relations against the cloud of gray scatter points representing the mass–light ellipticity relationship in the training data. We demonstrate how sensitive the population-level parameter recovery is to such a shift, and we suggest that we need a more informative cpdf in order to work with such distribution shifts seen in real data.

Other Images in This Article

Show More

Copyright and Terms & Conditions

Additional terms of reuse