Image Details

Choose export citation format:

GRB 060121: Implications of a Short‐/Intermediate‐Duration γ‐Ray Burst at High Redshift

  • Authors: A. de Ugarte Postigo, A. J. Castro-Tirado, S. Guziy, J. Gorosabel, G. Jóhannesson, M. A. Aloy, S. McBreen, D. Q. Lamb, N. Benitez, M. Jelínek, S. B. Pandey, D. Coe, M. D. Pérez-Ramírez, F. J. Aceituno, M. Alises, J. A. Acosta-Pulido, G. Gómez, R. López, T. Q. Donaghy, Y. E. Nakagawa, T. Sakamoto, G. R. Ricker, F. R. Hearty, M. Bayliss, G. Gyuk, and D. G. York

de Ugarte Postigo et al. 2006 The Astrophysical Journal Letters 648 L83.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Fig. 2.

Light curve of the afterglow in the near‐infrared (K), visible (R and I), and X‐ray bands. The figure shows the result of the best fit of the model in the most probable high‐z (4.6) case, which has been optimized with values of ﹩p=2.06﹩, ﹩\theta _{0}=0\fdg 6﹩, and ﹩n=0.1﹩ cm−3, and in the low‐z (1.7) case, which gives a slightly worse fit with ﹩p=2.05﹩, ﹩\theta _{0}=2\fdg 3﹩, and ﹩n=0.04﹩ cm−3. The filled symbols are data presented in this article, whereas open symbols are data from the literature.

Other Images in This Article
Copyright and Terms & Conditions