Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Phobos is not Hollow

  • Authors: Winter Parts, Jason T. Wright

Winter Parts and Jason T. Wright 2026 Research Notes of the AAS 10 .

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 1.

Difference in mean anomaly (referred to in B. P. Sharpless 1945 as longitude) between solid and hollow Phobos simulations over time. In blue (dashed line), we use a hollow Phobos reduced to 2.1 × 10−5 times the real mass of Phobos to reproduce Sharpless’s calculated inspiral rate of 5.7 cm yr−1. In orange (solid line), we used 6.8 × 10−5MPhobos to reproduce Phobos’s actual inspiral rate of 1.8 cm yr−1. The black xs are Sharpless’s data, with his estimated error bars.

Copyright and Terms & Conditions

Additional terms of reuse