Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Dynamical Modeling of Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes: Axisymmetry in Triaxial Schwarzschild Orbit Superposition Models

  • Authors: Matthew E. Quenneville, Christopher M. Liepold, and Chung-Pei Ma

2021 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 254 25.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 4.

Illustration of the changing MBH constraints in NGC 1453 as the orbit model goes through the step-by-step axisymmetrization procedure described in Sections 3 and 4. The starting case (red dotted) uses the original code with typical (near) axisymmetric parameters assumed in the literature (ψ = 90.°001; see Section 5.1 for details). The end case (black solid) uses our final axisymmetrized code including all changes from Sections 3 and 4. The four intermediate curves have all of the code fixes described in Section 4, but have different combinations of orbit types according to Sections 3.2 and 3.3. The left panel is for models with orbital weights chosen by fitting to the first four Gauss–Hermite moments of the LOSVDs determined from kinematic data, as is typical in the literature. The right panel uses 12 moments as constraints and shows tighter constraints on MBH, as is reported in Liepold et al. (2020). The 1D χ2 in MBH is obtained by marginalizing over the stellar mass-to-light ratio using a smoothed 2D χ2 landscape generated by Gaussian process regression with a squared-exponential covariance function (Pedregosa et al. 2011). The dark matter halo is fixed to the best-fit logarithmic halo in Liepold et al. (2020).

Other Images in This Article
Copyright and Terms & Conditions