Image Details

Choose export citation format:

Black Hole Formation in Fallback Supernova and the Spins of LIGO Sources

  • Authors: Sophie L. Schrøder, Aldo Batta, and Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz

2018 The Astrophysical Journal Letters 862 L3.

  • Provider: AAS Journals

Caption: Figure 3.

Dependence of a2 on ζ and d. Left panel: the spin parameter of M2 as a function of the accreted mass in units of M* for the three simulations shown in Figure 2. Here, all of the simulations have ζ = 0.4 and, as a result, the total accreted mass is similar. The solid lines correspond to the values derived from the simulations, while the dashed lines indicate the expected mass and angular momentum accretion from material that remains in the disk (Bardeen 1970; Thorne 1974) when the simulation ends at t = 80 t*. Middle panel: the dependence of a2 on ζ. All of the simulations shown have the same separation (d = 3 R*), but ζ = 0.1, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9. The dashed line represents the spin expected from direct collapse (i.e., ζ = 0). Right panel: the dependence of a2 on d* and ζ. The size of the symbols show the final BH mass, ranging from 8.2 M to 22.5 M. The vertical dashed line shows dτ, the radius for effective tidal synchronization (Zaldarriaga et al. 2018), and the vertical solid line shows dH, the binary separation required for merging within a Hubble time (28 M + 15 M). Dashed lines depict the spin expected from the direct collapse of different mass fractions, fM*, of the pre-SN star with f = 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1.

Other Images in This Article
Copyright and Terms & Conditions